Court rules against church. You can argue all you want about separation of church and state when it entails things like 10 commandment monuments or the role of Christian morality in the gay marriage debate, but this story should be truly frightening to anyone who stands by what the establishment clause was originally intended to be.
Apparently a court in California (why am I not more shocked) ruled against a church that revoked some people of their membership to the church. The church was operating within it's rules, but even if it wasn't what does this judicial decision say about the state of judicial activism? The decisions I listed above are debatable. This one is not.